BMW’s Software Glitch and the Future of Automotive Safety
- Admin
- Sep 10
- 4 min read

A recent recall by BMW affecting over 70,000 electric vehicles has sent a ripple through the automotive world, bringing to the forefront a critical and often under-discussed aspect of modern vehicle design: the growing complexity of software. The issue, which could cause a sudden loss of drive power, has sparked a debate about the integrity of safety-critical systems and the industry’s readiness to handle a future where cars are defined as much by their code as their mechanical engineering.
The recall, officially documented by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) under campaign number 25V-395, impacts a wide range of BMW’s EV lineup, including the 2022-2025 i4, 2022-2024 iX, 2023-2024 i7, and 2024 i5 models. According to the recall notice, the problem stems from a software bug in the electric drive motor.
This bug can "erroneously detect" a double-isolation fault—a serious electrical malfunction that the system is designed to prevent. When this false positive occurs, the software, as a safety protocol, commands a complete shutdown of the high-voltage system. The driver receives a warning on the dashboard, but propulsion power is lost approximately 15 to 20 seconds later. While steering and braking remain operational, the unexpected loss of motive power at any speed presents a significant and dangerous hazard.
This incident, while alarming, serves as a powerful case study in the fundamental safety engineering principles that the automotive industry is grappling with. The technical breakdown of the bug reveals a clear conflict with three core principles of functional safety:
The principle of Fail-Safe Design dictates that in the event of a failure, a system should revert to a state that is safe. In this situation, the software’s reaction to a perceived fault was to shut down the drivetrain. While this seems "safe" from an electrical perspective, it introduces a dangerous driving condition by causing a loss of propulsion. A more ideal fail-safe design would aim to mitigate the risk to vehicle occupants by perhaps limiting power or providing a limp-home mode rather than causing a complete loss of propulsion.
Next, the principle of Fault Tolerance is the ability of a system to continue operating even when one or more components fail. The software bug, which is essentially a single component failure, should not have had the catastrophic effect of disabling the entire vehicle's drivetrain. A robust, fault-tolerant system would have multiple redundancies or alternative paths to ensure that the core function—propulsion—is maintained.
Finally, the principle of Graceful Degradation suggests that a system should reduce its functionality in a controlled manner rather than experiencing an abrupt and complete failure. For instance, if a problem is detected, the car could reduce its top speed or power output, providing the driver with a safe way to pull over. The 15-20 second warning is a form of graceful degradation, but the ultimate outcome of a complete power loss is a severe form of degradation that borders on complete failure.
The solution to this critical bug is a testament to the modern convenience and efficiency that connected vehicles offer: an over-the-air (OTA) software update. However, this raises broader, more profound questions for the industry as it moves towards a software-defined future. The central question is: How did this pass safety testing in the first place? This suggests that current validation protocols may not be comprehensive enough to handle the complexity of modern automotive software. This is where industry-wide standards and best practices become paramount.
The automotive industry is in a race to "software-define" vehicles, but software engineering discipline must keep pace with innovation. The industry must move beyond simply adding new features and instead focus on a holistic approach to software safety that is integrated from the very beginning of the design process. This means adopting stricter development frameworks, investing in more thorough and realistic testing, and prioritizing the core principles of fail-safe design, fault tolerance, and graceful degradation.
This is where international standards like ISO 26262, which governs functional safety, come into play. ISO 26262 outlines a risk-based approach for developing safety-critical systems, providing a methodical framework to identify, assess, and mitigate hazards throughout a vehicle's lifecycle. While not legally mandated in most places, adherence to this standard is considered the state of the art in automotive engineering and can help prevent the kind of bugs that led to the BMW recall.
The path forward is clear: a culture of continuous software safety validation. Manufacturers must invest in sophisticated testing methods like Hardware-in-the-Loop (HIL) and Software-in-the-Loop (SIL) simulations, which can catch complex errors before they ever reach a production vehicle. Furthermore, the industry must address the long-term reliability and security of OTA updates, which are becoming the primary method for delivering critical fixes.
This includes ensuring update integrity, guarding against cybersecurity threats, and providing clear communication to vehicle owners. As a growing number of vehicle functions are being managed by code, the ability of a manufacturer to ensure the safety and reliability of its software is no longer a luxury—it is a core measure of quality that consumers, and the market as a whole, will demand.
Stay informed about the latest developments in EV technology and battery safety by subscribing to our newsletter at chargeduppro.com
About Us
Charged UP! is one of the most widely read publications in the EV charging space. Our approach is to take topics that are of interest to everyone and mention companies that provide best-in-class approaches.
To discuss including your products or services, contact us at info@chargeduppro.com. At Charged Up!, we are committed to keeping businesses and individuals informed about the evolving EV landscape.
For more updates and insights, subscribe to our newsletter at chargeduppro.com






Comments