California’s EV Mandate Faces Repeal as GOP Pushes Back on Unachievable Standards

The debate over the future of electric vehicles (EVs) in the United States is heating up, with California’s ambitious EV mandate now coming under scrutiny in Congress. The state’s strict rules, which require automakers to sell increasing numbers of zero-emission vehicles, have faced mounting criticism from the auto industry, with many calling the regulations unrealistic and damaging to the broader market.

The Biden administration recently approved a waiver that allows California to set its own vehicle greenhouse gas emissions standards. This waiver, granted under the Clean Air Act, was originally intended to address pollutants that contribute to smog. However, critics argue that carbon dioxide (CO2), which California’s new rules aim to regulate, does not contribute to smog, raising questions about the necessity of these stringent vehicle emissions standards. Despite this, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approved the state’s ban on internal-combustion engine cars by 2035, as well as the zero-emission vehicle quotas that apply to automakers.

Under these new rules, automakers will be required to ensure that zero-emission vehicles make up 43% of their sales in California by 2027. This target will increase to 68% by 2030. These regulations are intended to push automakers toward a cleaner, more sustainable future. However, the reality is that automakers are finding these targets to be incredibly challenging to meet. In fact, the industry's own projections suggest that electric vehicles only accounted for 13% of sales in California in 2023. The situation is even worse in other states like Massachusetts, New Jersey, and New York, where EV adoption rates are much lower.

For many automakers, meeting these quotas would require them to dramatically slash the prices of their electric vehicles, which could result in steep losses. In addition, manufacturers would likely need to reduce production of gasoline-powered vehicles in California and other states that have adopted California’s regulations, which could hurt sales overall. Automakers also face the challenge of raising prices on their gasoline-powered cars nationwide to offset the losses from their EV sales. Alternatively, companies could purchase regulatory credits from Tesla, but this could further hurt their bottom line.

In response to the increasing pressure on the auto industry, Lee Zeldin, former EPA Administrator under Donald Trump, has introduced a resolution to repeal California’s EV mandate in Congress. The resolution was submitted under the Congressional Review Act (CRA), a powerful tool that allows lawmakers to overturn federal regulations with a simple majority in both chambers of Congress. If the resolution passes, it could effectively end California’s ability to impose such stringent rules on automakers, thereby preventing the state’s EV mandate from coming back into effect.

The CRA also has a significant advantage over other methods of repealing regulations: it bars judicial review of resolutions and prevents future administrations from reintroducing a similar rule. This means that if Congress succeeds in using the CRA to repeal California’s EV mandate, the regulation could not be reinstated in the same form. This provides an effective check on California’s power to set national auto industry standards and limits the influence of state-driven regulations on the broader automotive market.

As Congress works to decide the future of California’s EV mandate, it is clear that the auto industry faces significant hurdles in meeting the state’s strict emissions targets. With California’s plan requiring automakers to rapidly accelerate EV production, many are concerned about the impact of these rules on car prices, job losses, and the overall accessibility of electric vehicles for consumers. While the transition to a green future is important, the reality is that forcing automakers to make such significant and sudden changes could result in severe market disruptions.

The outcome of the CRA resolution will play a crucial role in determining the direction of the U.S. auto industry in the coming years. If the resolution passes and California’s EV mandate is repealed, automakers may have more flexibility to meet EV adoption targets at their own pace, ensuring that the industry can grow sustainably and that the benefits of EV technology are accessible to a wider range of consumers.

As the EV transition continues, balancing environmental goals with economic realities will be essential. The future of electric vehicles in the U.S. depends on finding solutions that ensure the widespread adoption of clean technologies without creating undue burdens on the automotive industry and consumers alike.

At Charged Up!, we are committed to keeping businesses and individuals informed about the evolving EV landscape. For more updates and insights, subscribe to our newsletter at chargeduppro.com/subscribe.