Should You Use V2G for Your EV? A Closer Look at Battery Impact and Financial Viability

When purchasing an electric vehicle (EV), many people focus on the convenience and environmental benefits of driving an EV, but there's one factor that can significantly affect the long-term value of your investment: battery cycles. With the rapid development of technology, the concept of Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) has gained attention. V2G involves using your EV’s battery to discharge energy back into the grid, helping support grid stability in exchange for compensation. But is this practice worth it, or does it come at the expense of the vehicle’s long-term health?

The Battery Cycle Dilemma

Consider the example of a four-year-old Tesla Model 3 with 65,000 kilometers driven and 295 charging cycles. This particular model has a battery degradation rate of 6%, resulting in a range reduction from 424 km to 398 km. If this vehicle had been used for V2G, the scenario changes drastically.

Using V2G at half a cycle per day would mean more than 1,000 cycles. This could cause battery degradation of nearly 20%, leading to a significant drop in the vehicle’s range, potentially bringing it to less than 350 km. The financial gain from the V2G operation would likely not offset the cost of replacing a degraded battery, and selling the car later would likely become much more challenging due to the compromised battery life.

The Real Costs of V2G

While V2G presents an intriguing concept, its financial viability doesn’t always hold up upon closer inspection. A standard Level 2 charger costs significantly less than the V2G-compatible charger, which can be up to 10 times more expensive. Considering the high upfront cost, it would take a long time for most EV owners to see a return on their investment, especially if the benefit from V2G is not substantial.

Additionally, although V2G’s discharge rate is gentler than typical charging, it still places additional stress on the battery over time, which impacts its lifespan. For many, the cost of a V2G charger simply doesn’t make sense given the potential for reduced battery performance and the time it would take to break even on the investment.

The Tesla Example: Why Battery Degradation Matters

In the example with the Tesla Model 3, the car uses an LFP battery and is charged almost exclusively using a slow 11kW charger, which is typically gentler on the battery. Even with such a setup, the 6% degradation over four years is noticeable. While V2G may seem like an appealing way to earn a little extra money, the risk of further degradation is not negligible.

The concern is that, while Tesla's LFP batteries are more resilient compared to other types of lithium-ion batteries, they still suffer from degradation when used in V2G, and the long-term risks outweigh the short-term rewards. If the V2G system were used extensively, it could lead to a much shorter lifespan for the battery, prompting the need for a new vehicle sooner than expected.

Long-Term Grid Benefits and Financial Implications

While V2G may hold potential for grid-side applications, where the energy stored in EV batteries can be used to support the grid during peak demand, the reality is that most of these benefits will be quickly monetized by large grid-side storage systems. These commercial-scale systems are designed to handle grid requirements much more efficiently than individual vehicles, meaning the potential revenues from V2G will likely decrease over time.

This has already been seen in Europe and the UK, where grid-side energy markets, particularly in the frequency regulation markets, faced shrinking revenues as commercial batteries began to handle most of the tasks. This means that for everyday consumers looking to use V2G for personal gain, the financial rewards might be short-lived as larger energy companies capture the bulk of the market.

A Better Alternative: One-Way Charging

Instead of relying on V2G, many owners are turning to one-way scheduled charging, which allows for the vehicle to charge at optimal times without draining the battery through discharge. This method avoids the risks associated with battery degradation and does not impact the battery’s lifespan, allowing the vehicle’s battery to function optimally over a longer period of time. In fact, 80%-90% of the grid-side revenues can be captured through scheduled one-way charging, making this a far less risky and cost-effective option for most EV owners.

Conclusion: The Risks of V2G

While V2G technology holds significant promise in supporting grid stability, it is not without its trade-offs for individual EV owners. The combination of the high cost of V2G equipment, the risk of accelerating battery degradation, and the limited financial return makes it less appealing for the average consumer. For most EV owners, focusing on one-way charging remains a more sustainable and cost-effective approach to managing energy use while preserving battery life.

As the market matures and technology advances, V2G may find a more prominent role in commercial applications, where the large-scale management of energy use can lead to more significant benefits. But for the everyday EV owner, it might be best to stick with tried-and-true charging methods to ensure the longevity and health of your vehicle.

At Charged Up!, we are committed to keeping businesses and individuals informed about the evolving EV landscape. For more updates and insights, subscribe to our newsletter at chargeduppro.com/subscribe.